MemeAssist

SpaceX (SPCX) Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

Saved analysis ·

Saved verdict: SpaceX saved Trade Check decision at analysis time: avoid. This is historical evidence, not a current buy or sell signal. Recorded token safety: dangerous. Recorded Trade Setup quality: unavailable.

Overall Health Score: SpaceX received an Overall Health Score of 14 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: SpaceX received a High Rug Risk Rating.

Solana mint: 2HzmYL6FPW7oa7A294GptCDE7XFo3nF7q9xeVbo8iwo5

Stale: analysed 73 days ago. Scores may be out of date. Re-analyse before trading.

Saved analysis, not live, re-analyse before trading.

Avoid

Looks like a copycat of a bigger token with the same ticker

Health Score
14/100
Rug risk
65/100 · High

Looks like a copycat of a bigger token with the same ticker. Turnover is unverified because 24-hour volume or positive pool liquidity is missing. A valid measured setup is not established.

  • Turnover is unverified because 24-hour volume or positive pool liquidity is missing.
  • Looks like a copycat of a bigger token with the same ticker
  • A valid measured setup is not established.

Flags

Ranked flags unavailable.

Trade setup

No reliable setup: unavailable.

Read the saved analysis

Automated risk analysis by MemeAssist.

Historical analysis snapshot.

At a glance: SpaceX (SPCX) is an 18-hour-old token on Meteora with zero reported 24h volume, null market cap, and null liquidity — making exit feasibility completely unverifiable from available data. Supply concentration is extreme: 52 wallets each holding >1% of supply collectively control ~90% of all tokens, and every tracked whale has held for less than one day, with zero 'never-sold' flags across the cohort. Mint and freeze authorities are both inactive, which is the one meaningful structural positive. Active sell pressure is net-negative with whale wallets (>1% holders) driving ~40% of sell volume in the first ~1.4 hours of observable data, and the decentralisation trend is already flagged as worsening. This token is far too young to judge any long-term durability, and the combination of unknown liquidity, extreme concentration in sub-24-hour wallets, and active whale-led selling makes participation indefensible at this stage.

Exact Solana mint: 2HzmYL6FPW7oa7A294GptCDE7XFo3nF7q9xeVbo8iwo5. Verify this Solana mint on Solscan.

SPCX Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: SpaceX received an Overall Health Score of 14 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: SpaceX received a High Rug Risk Rating.

What changed between saved analyses?

No earlier completed analysis is available for comparison.

SPCX Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

  • Observed wallet activity does not establish the wallet holder's motives or conviction.
  • Both liquidityUsd and marketCapUsd are null, and 24h volume is reported as zero. There is no way to assess whether any meaningful exit is possible without on-chain pool inspection, and thin or absent liquidity with 90% whale concentration is a classic exit-scam structural setup.
  • Whale wallets (>1% of supply) accounted for ~40% of all sell volume in the first ~1.4 hours; top sellers including unlabelled wallet, Be4S…Ba2, and G4Yo…XHN are all top holders trimming within hours of acquisition, and net volume is negative across every observed window.

SPCX Risk and Health Signals

  • Smart-money signal: no tracked participation was observed.
  • Neither mintAuthorityActive nor freezeAuthorityActive is true, and both authority addresses are null, meaning the token supply cannot be inflated and wallets cannot be frozen by the issuer — a basic structural positive.
  • The clusters array is empty and no slow-rug signals are flagged, meaning there is no direct on-chain evidence of suspected coordinated insider clusters from the available data — though the extreme concentration itself warrants caution regardless. Same-slot timing alone does not establish coordination or common ownership; shared signed transactions establish co-execution only.
  • The identified creator wallet held 0.00% of supply at 2026-08-23 17:49 UTC. 0 tokens were recorded as DEX sales over the preceding 7 days. A last-sale timestamp was not provided; this does not establish ongoing selling or team-wide exposure.

SPCX Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: At the saved analysis, the top 10 non-pool holders held 21.81% of supply.

Is SPCX Safe?

  • Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
  • Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
  • Copycat check: a possible match was detected.
  • Sellability check: inconclusive.

SPCX Risk Analysis Questions

Which Solana token does this SPCX report analyse?

SpaceX (SPCX) is identified by Solana mint 2HzmYL6FPW7oa7A294GptCDE7XFo3nF7q9xeVbo8iwo5; names and symbols can be reused by unrelated tokens.

What is the AI health score for SpaceX (SPCX)?

The saved analysis recorded an AI health score of 14/100 for SPCX, based on on-chain behaviour, holder distribution and liquidity at that time.

What is the automated rug risk level for SpaceX (SPCX)?

The on-chain checks rated rug risk for SPCX as 'High'.

What is the entry assessment for SpaceX (SPCX)?

The entry assessment for SPCX is avoid.

How much liquidity does SpaceX (SPCX) have?

Liquidity for SPCX was not established in this saved analysis.

Are the mint and freeze authorities active for SpaceX (SPCX)?

At the saved check for SPCX, the mint authority was revoked and the freeze authority was revoked.

What is the top-10 holder concentration for SpaceX (SPCX)?

At the saved check, the top 10 holders held 21.81% of the total supply of SPCX.

Was a sell route found for SpaceX (SPCX) in the saved analysis?

Sell-route availability for SPCX was not established in the saved analysis.

When was the AI analysis for SpaceX (SPCX) last updated?

The on-chain analysis for SPCX was last updated on 23/08/2026, 17:49:25 GMT.

Methodology & limitations

Health and rug risk are separate evidence ratings; unknown checks are not passes and projected levels are untested.

Saved analysis, not live, re-analyse before trading.

Recently analysed tokens · Screened Solana rankings