SPCX Meme Coin Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

SPCX Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: SpaceX has an Overall Health Score of 10 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: SpaceX has an extreme Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.

Trade Check: SpaceX saved Trade Check decision at analysis time: avoid. This is historical evidence, not a current buy or sell signal. Recorded token safety: dangerous. Recorded Trade Setup quality: unavailable.

Trade Setup: Trade Setup status: unavailable. Trade levels are time-sensitive and should be re-analysed when stale.

SPCX Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

• Wallet [redacted wallet] holds 80% and FM8a…xpf holds 18.7% of all tokens. Any coordinated or single-wallet sell from either position would be catastrophic to price with no liquidity depth to absorb it.
• liquidityUsd is reported as $0 against a $1.84M market cap, meaning there is no verified on-chain pool depth to sell into. Exit feasibility is completely unverifiable at this snapshot.
• With only 54 candles (~4 hours) of price history and 72 holders, every metric is based on an extremely thin dataset; no structural durability can be inferred.

SPCX Risk and Health Signals

• mintAuthorityActive and freezeAuthorityActive are both false with null authority addresses, eliminating the risk of new token issuance or account freezing by a deployer.
• The identified dev address shows zero sell activity across 1d/7d/30d windows and the slow-rug risk heuristic is rated low — though the dev address resolves to the system program, limiting confidence in this signal.
• 32,261 buys vs 24,852 sells in 24h, and only 15 sell trades vs 5,975 buy trades by count, with 8 unique sellers — suggesting minimal active distribution so far.

SPCX Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 99.4% of supply.

Is SPCX Safe?

• Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
• Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
• Copycat check: a possible match was detected.
• Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
• Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.

SPCX Trade Setup, Entry Levels and Targets

Support and resistance context: 3 support areas and 2 resistance areas were identified from 5m market candles; nearest support: 0.00001611064306365568; nearest resistance: 0.00001928218814875411; Levels derived from 54 5m candles (~4 hours) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. History is too short for repeated-touch levels; some levels are derived from volume-profile nodes and the window high/low (lower confidence, untested). Heuristic zones, not trading advice..

SPCX Price and Market Data

Assessment: SPCX (SpaceX) is a ~1-day-old PumpSwap token with a $1.84M market cap and a reported $46M in 24h volume, but $0 recorded DEX liquidity — an immediately disqualifying structural problem that makes exit feasibility completely unverifiable. The holder structure is catastrophically concentrated: wallet [redacted wallet] holds 80% of supply and wallet FM8a…xpf holds 18.7%, meaning just two unlabelled wallets control 98.7% of all tokens with zero selling activity recorded — which may reflect locked/bundled supply rather than organic conviction. The two dominant whales have null holding-period data, null never-sold flags, and no cluster linkage data available, so their intentions cannot be assessed; any sell from either wallet would collapse the market. Mint and freeze authorities are both inactive, which removes one class of contract risk, and sell pressure so far has been trivially small (only 8 unique sellers, all small wallets), but with only 72 holders and 1 day of history, this is far too young to draw durable conclusions.

Reason: With $0 verified DEX liquidity, two anonymous wallets holding 98.7% of supply with null holding-period data, a volume/liquidity mismatch that cannot be explained, and only 1 day of history, participation is indefensible regardless of buy-side momentum.

Report limitations

• This automated snapshot can be wrong, incomplete, or become outdated as on-chain and market conditions change.
• It is informational analysis, not financial advice or a guarantee that the token is safe.