Server-rendered summary

SPCX Meme Coin Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

Saved analysis: . The findings below describe evidence recorded at that time, not live market conditions.

Historical analysis snapshot. This report is more than six hours old. This snapshot is not a current buy or sell signal. Trade decisions, prices, levels and sellability may have changed. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.

Exact Solana mint: BYDDsqFCZuJQEj96K7ApfgRwsnMDbL8S53knHvF4HZ1B

SPCX Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: SpaceX has an Overall Health Score of 8 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: SpaceX has an extreme Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.

Trade Check: SpaceX saved Trade Check decision at analysis time: avoid. This is historical evidence, not a current buy or sell signal. Recorded token safety: dangerous. Recorded Trade Setup quality: unavailable.

Trade Setup: Trade Setup status: unavailable. Trade levels are time-sensitive and should be re-analysed when stale.

SPCX Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

  • Wallet [redacted wallet] (owner FhVo…LuM) holds 80% and [redacted wallet] (owner HVxx…sus) holds 18.7% of total supply; combined they represent 98.7% concentration with zero days of track record or identity. Any movement from either wallet would be catastrophic for remaining holders.
  • Liquidity is reported as $0 on the active PumpSwap pair, meaning there is no observable depth for the concentrated supply holders to exit through without total price collapse. This is a textbook exit-scam setup regardless of volume optics.
  • Wallet 3xxF…CuK sold 6.71 billion tokens — 87.8% of total sell volume — and fully exited within approximately 1 day of the token's creation, indicating coordinated early distribution rather than organic trading.

SPCX Risk and Health Signals

  • Neither mint nor freeze authority is active, which eliminates the risk of new token creation or wallet freezing; this is a baseline hygiene pass but does not offset the concentration risk.
  • 5,940 buy transactions versus 21 sell transactions over ~20 hours appears strongly bullish in isolation, but the 77% price crash and zero current liquidity reveal this as uninformed retail buying into coordinated insider distribution.
  • Wallets holding 80% and 18.7% of supply show zero change in 1d/7d/30d tracking windows; this could indicate holding conviction, but with no history or identity, it is equally consistent with not yet having sold — the overhang remains fully intact.

SPCX Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 99.4% of supply.

Is SPCX Safe?

  • Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
  • Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
  • Copycat check: a possible match was detected.
  • Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
  • Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.

SPCX Trade Setup, Entry Levels and Targets

Support and resistance context: 1 support area and 0 resistance areas were identified from 15m market candles; nearest support: 0.000001613931898605462; Levels derived from 32 15m candles (~8 hours) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. History is too short for repeated-touch levels; some levels are derived from volume-profile nodes and the window high/low (lower confidence, untested). Heuristic zones, not trading advice..

SPCX Price and Market Data

Assessment: SPCX (SpaceX) is a 1-day-old Solana memecoin with a catastrophically concentrated holder structure: two wallets ([redacted wallet] and [redacted wallet]) control ~80% and ~18.7% of supply respectively, leaving 98.7% of total supply in just two hands with no pool labelling, no wallet identity, and no track record. Reported on-chain liquidity is zero, making any meaningful exit for the concentrated holders theoretically impossible without destroying the price; the $82M 24h volume figure is almost certainly inflated by the large early sell-through of wallet 3xxF…CuK, which dumped ~6.7 billion tokens (~88% of all sell volume in 20 hours) and fully exited within a day of launch. Both mint and freeze authorities are inactive, which removes one class of structural risk, but with 99.4% of supply in the top 10, zero liquidity depth reported, only 90 total holders, and a 77% price crash in 24 hours, this token exhibits every hallmark of a launch-and-dump structure. The token is far too young and structurally too dangerous to assess durability.

Reason: Two unidentified wallets control 98.7% of supply with zero liquidity depth, early coordinated sellers have fully exited, price has crashed 77% in one day, and the token is too young to demonstrate any structural durability.

Report limitations

  • This automated snapshot can be wrong, incomplete, or become outdated as on-chain and market conditions change.
  • It is informational analysis, not financial advice or a guarantee that the token is safe.

Read the MemeAssist methodology for evidence sources, scoring and known constraints.

Analyzed: