Server-rendered summary

SIGF Meme Coin Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

Exact Solana mint: CwSNUU54NLJt4qbGg5S8TUzJYxjYAfL4VrPr7zvJpump

SIGF Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: Superintelligence Gaming Factory has an Overall Health Score of 47 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: Superintelligence Gaming Factory has a low Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.

SIGF Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

  • SIGF is only ~2 days old with no track record. Every whale, holder cohort, and momentum signal is provisional — early speculative buyers and flippers are structurally indistinguishable from genuine long-term holders at this stage.
  • No dev address could be resolved on-chain, meaning insider selling, supply lock status, and creator rug history cannot be assessed. This is the single largest blind spot in the risk profile.
  • Wallet [redacted wallet] sold ~17.3M tokens (~14.8% of 6h sell volume) over the past day while still holding ~1.5% of supply, and is classified as distributing. This is not a full exit but represents meaningful ongoing sell pressure from a whale-tier wallet.

SIGF Risk and Health Signals

  • All but one of the top 10 non-pool whales show positive net token flow over the past 24h, with aggregate net whale inflow of ~19.4M tokens on the day — reflecting broad large-wallet demand at current prices, though all holding periods are under 2.2 days.
  • 24h volume of ~$1.52M represents approximately 2.8× the market cap, a high-turnover signal consistent with active speculative interest. Buy trade count (5,992) meaningfully exceeds sell count (5,086) over the full 24h window.
  • Both mint and freeze authorities are null and inactive — the issuer cannot inflate supply or freeze wallets, removing two of the most dangerous structural controls common in pump tokens.

SIGF Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 21.4% of supply.

Is SIGF Safe?

  • Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
  • Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
  • Copycat check: no match detected.
  • Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
  • Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.

SIGF Trade Setup, Entry Levels and Targets

Support and resistance context: 2 support areas and 4 resistance areas were identified from 1h market candles; nearest support: 0.00048445294185705634; nearest resistance: 0.000605955; Levels derived from 49 1h candles (~2.0 days) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. Heuristic zones, not trading advice. Chart history could not yet support tested swing levels. The token is only about 2.1 days old. These lower-confidence planning levels are projected mechanically from the observed market price and must be rechecked as price history develops..

SIGF Price and Market Data

Assessment: SIGF (Superintelligence Gaming Factory) is a 2-day-old PumpSwap token with a ~$539K market cap and $83.5K in DEX liquidity — adequate depth for this size but thin enough that large coordinated exits could move price significantly. Mint and freeze authorities are both revoked, removing the most acute structural controls. Supply concentration is moderate-to-high: the top 20 non-pool wallets hold ~32.5% of supply spread across 25 whale wallets, each holding under 3% individually, with no single dominant insider-scale position visible and no detected wallet clusters. The overwhelming majority of named whales (9 of 10 tracked) are showing net accumulation over the past day, but all whale holding periods average only ~1.2 days, meaning this "accumulation" is entirely within the token's lifespan and carries no durability signal whatsoever — the token is simply too young to distinguish sticky holders from speculative flippers. Sell pressure over the past 6 hours is marginally net-negative (sell volume slightly exceeds buy volume), with one top-holder ([redacted wallet]) distributing ~17.3M tokens while retaining ~1.5% of supply; this is a watch signal but not yet a rug signal. The creator wallet could not be identified, which removes the most important insider-risk check and must weigh against confidence.

Reason: An unidentified creator wallet combined with a 2-day track record and worsening decentralisation means structural risk cannot be properly assessed, making this a speculative momentum trade only for those who accept the possibility of a rapid exit by unknown insiders.

Report limitations

  • This automated snapshot can be wrong, incomplete, or become outdated as on-chain and market conditions change.
  • It is informational analysis, not financial advice or a guarantee that the token is safe.

Read the MemeAssist methodology for evidence sources, scoring and known constraints.

Analyzed: