tOpenAI Meme Coin Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

tOpenAI Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: T-OpenAI has an Overall Health Score of 18 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: T-OpenAI has an extreme Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.

Trade Check: T-OpenAI Trade Check decision: avoid. Token safety: dangerous. Trade Setup quality: weak. Condition to watch: Reconsider only after deterministic danger clears.

Trade Setup: Trade Setup status: weak. Trade levels are time-sensitive and should be re-analysed when stale.

tOpenAI Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

• Both mint authority (EXvTtu…) and freeze authority (7n2PNc…) are live on separate wallets, meaning supply can be inflated or any holder account can be frozen at any time — a fundamental structural danger for retail holders.
• The creator-linked wallet sold ~137.8 tokens in the last 7 days and ~147.4 tokens over 30 days against a 684.6-token total supply; this represents the disposal of roughly 20–21% of all tokens, a textbook distribution pattern.
• On-chain token transfers link a first cluster (3 wallets, ~23.4% combined) and a second (4 wallets, ~9.6% combined) — all with holding durations of hours to days, consistent with coordinated launch-day accumulation ahead of distribution.

tOpenAI Risk and Health Signals

• DEX liquidity of ~$642K against a ~$1.13M market cap (~57% ratio) is genuinely deep for a token at this size, making large exits feasible without catastrophic slippage under current conditions.
• Volume is roughly 2.6× the market cap, which signals high turnover and active trading; however, in the context of insider distribution, elevated volume is more likely rotational selling than sustained organic demand.
• Five of ten tracked whales show accumulating status, but all five are wallets first seen within the past 24 hours — fresh accumulation in a distribution environment is ambiguous at best and may reflect insider re-loading between sells.

tOpenAI Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 51.0% of supply.

Is tOpenAI Safe?

• Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
• Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
• Copycat check: no match detected.
• Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
• Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.

tOpenAI Trade Setup, Entry Levels and Targets

Support and resistance context: 4 support areas and 2 resistance areas were identified from 1h market candles; nearest support: 1207.1514415231422; nearest resistance: 2795.17267522595; Levels derived from 999 1h candles (~41.8 days) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. Price is at/near its window high with no overhead swing resistance; resistance shown is the window high plus measured-move projections. Heuristic zones, not trading advice..

tOpenAI Price and Market Data

Assessment: T-OpenAI (tOpenAI) is a ~96-day-old Solana memecoin with both mint and freeze authorities still active under different wallets (EXvTtu… and 7n2PNc…), representing live unilateral control over supply and holder balances — the single most critical structural flaw. The confirmed dev wallet (EXvTtu…, confidence: low) has sold 137.77 tokens in the last 7 days and 147.42 tokens over 30 days against a total supply of only 684.6 tokens, meaning the creator has offloaded roughly 21% of total supply. Two linked insider clusters are identified by on-chain token transfers: one (2MuViX…, Aw7S3K…, syfpFK…) holding a combined ~23.4% and a second (projjo…, DJHsKK…, FundHf…, 8kQKbZ…) holding ~9.6%, together controlling over 33% of supply — all with holding durations measured in hours or days. Concentration is severe: the top 10 non-pool holders control ~51% of supply, and 5 of the 10 tracked whales are "accumulating" wallets first seen fewer than one day ago, with a worsening decentralisation trend. Liquidity is relatively deep at ~$642K against a ~$1.13M market cap (~57%), which supports exit feasibility for now, and 24h volume at ~$2.97M is high, but this volume must be read in the context of active insider distribution — volume here is consistent with rotation out of insider positions, not organic demand.

Reason: Active mint and freeze authorities combined with confirmed dev selling of ~21% of total supply and two on-chain-linked insider clusters controlling ~33% of supply make this token structurally indefensible for new entrants.

Report limitations

• This automated snapshot can be wrong, incomplete, or become outdated as on-chain and market conditions change.
• It is informational analysis, not financial advice or a guarantee that the token is safe.