CAPYBARA Meme Coin Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

CAPYBARA Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: Capybara With A Gun has an Overall Health Score of 45 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: Capybara With A Gun has a low Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.

Trade Check: Capybara With A Gun Trade Check decision: wait. Token safety: caution. Trade Setup quality: weak. Condition to watch: Require verified historical price coverage and reassess the market structure.

Trade Setup: Trade Setup status: weak. Trade levels are time-sensitive and should be re-analysed when stale.

CAPYBARA Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

• Four top-whale wallets (combined ~6.7% of supply) are linked by direct on-chain token transfers. One cluster member (55s9…XM) is already distributing, having shed ~1.59M tokens within the observable window — coordinated exit from a cluster is a slow-rug precursor.
• The token is approximately 7 hours old with only 89 five-minute candles of price history. All support levels are projected and untested, historical price risk is unavailable, and no holding-duration confidence exists; any assessment here is entirely provisional.
• The average whale holding period is roughly 4 hours, zero whales are flagged as never-sold, and all accumulation activity began within the last day. This holder base has shown no willingness to hold through adversity.

CAPYBARA Risk and Health Signals

• The confirmed pump.fun creator wallet (dtrz…Xdy) currently holds 0% of supply and has recorded no swap sells in any measured window. The most structurally dangerous insider exit vector is not active.
• Buys outpace sells 29,235 vs 24,203 over 24h and 11,024 vs 8,586 over 6h; the recent 49-swap sample shows $2.47M buy volume vs $1.15M sell volume. Retail demand is genuine and sustained.
• Both mint and freeze authorities are null and inactive, meaning no party can inflate supply or freeze wallets — a clean structural baseline for a token this young.

CAPYBARA Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 15.3% of supply.

Is CAPYBARA Safe?

• Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
• Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
• Copycat check: no match detected.
• Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
• Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.

CAPYBARA Trade Setup, Entry Levels and Targets

Support and resistance context: 2 support areas and 3 resistance areas were identified from 5m market candles; nearest support: 0.0005637333952555784; nearest resistance: 0.000669827824620726; Levels derived from 89 5m candles (~7 hours) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. History is too short for repeated-touch levels; some levels are derived from volume-profile nodes and the window high/low (lower confidence, untested). Heuristic zones, not trading advice..

CAPYBARA Price and Market Data

Assessment: Capybara With A Gun (CAPYBARA) is an ultra-fresh PumpSwap token launched roughly 7 hours ago with no established track record — it is far too young to assess long-term durability, and every structural observation must be treated as provisional. The token has attracted genuine trading interest ($3.9M 24h volume, ~5,000 holders, buy-side dominant flow) and its creator wallet currently holds 0% of supply with no active selling recorded, which removes the most acute insider exit risk. However, a confirmed cluster of four top-whale wallets (EANb…Kw6, 55s9…XM, 44Te…JV, 2jDw…hk) linked by direct token transfers between them controls a combined ~6.7% of supply; one wallet in the cluster (55s9…XM) is already distributing. Mint and freeze authorities are revoked, which is structurally clean. Liquidity of $77K against a $602K market cap (~12.9% ratio) is workable but thin for the whale concentration present, and the decentralisation trend is flagged as worsening as fresh whales accumulate. Historical price risk is unavailable — the pool is too new for a meaningful candle-based assessment, so prior drawdown damage is unknown. Support levels are purely projected (untested), and the only resistance levels have very limited touch history, making any trade setup provisional at best.

Reason: A confirmed linked wallet cluster controlling ~6.7% of supply with one member already distributing, combined with zero holder track record and purely projected support levels, makes this a structurally elevated-risk trade despite strong buy-side flow and a clean creator wallet.

Report limitations

• Historical price-risk coverage is unavailable.
• This automated snapshot can be wrong, incomplete, or become outdated as on-chain and market conditions change.
• It is informational analysis, not financial advice or a guarantee that the token is safe.