Server-rendered summary
Nike Meme Coin Risk Analysis & Trade Setup
Exact Solana mint: 4Y7v8nwJMsquqhttM2q3crocGfu7pDMgwdwsH2eoqcxv
Nike Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary
Overall Health Score: Nike has an Overall Health Score of 42 out of 100.
Rug Risk Rating: Nike has a low Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.
Nike Rug-Pull Risk Analysis
- Wallet [redacted wallet] holds 13.2% of supply with no label, no holding history, and no confirmed relationship to the creator. If this is an insider or bundled launch allocation, it represents the single largest exit-pressure risk.
- No dev wallet could be identified from on-chain data. Creator exposure, rug history, and insider allocation cannot be assessed — a fundamental gap for a token this young.
- The token is approximately 5 minutes old. Any positive signals (holder count, buy flow, liquidity) have zero durability evidence and can evaporate within minutes.
Nike Risk and Health Signals
- Both mint and freeze authorities are inactive with no dangerous token extensions detected, removing two common mechanisms for supply-based rugs.
- 2,517 holders within minutes of launch, with the top 20 non-whale holders each holding an identical ~360,500 tokens (~0.036%), suggesting wide retail distribution rather than tight insider clustering.
- In the observable trading window, buys (278 trades, ~$17.9K) outpaced sells (212 trades, ~$17.8K), with net volume marginally positive — though the window covers only minutes and is not predictive.
Nike Holder Distribution
Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 13.5% of supply.
Is Nike Safe?
- Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
- Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
- Copycat check: no match detected.
- Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
- Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.
Nike Trade Setup, Entry Levels and Targets
Support and resistance context: 2 support areas and 4 resistance areas were identified from provisional market candles; nearest support: 0.000404064; nearest resistance: 0.000441945; Chart history could not yet support tested swing levels. The token is only about 0.0 days old. These lower-confidence planning levels are projected mechanically from the observed market price and must be rechecked as price history develops..
Nike Price and Market Data
Assessment: Nike (Nike) on Solana is an ultra-fresh memecoin launched less than one hour ago (≈0.003 days old), making any durability judgement impossible at this stage — this is a pure momentum snapshot with no track record. The token has 2,517 holders and a market cap of ~$421K against $57.6K in DEX liquidity (~13.7% liq/mcap ratio), which is reasonable for its size. The most significant structural concern is a single unlabelled wallet ([redacted wallet]) holding 13.2% of supply — its identity, funding source, and relationship to the creator cannot be determined from available data, and no dev wallet has been identified. Mint and freeze authorities are both revoked, removing two common rug vectors. Sell pressure in the observable window is almost entirely from small retail wallets, with the largest single seller (4Zxs…rDK, ~66% of sell volume) being a non-top-holder that has fully exited — consistent with early flip behaviour rather than insider distribution. The 743% price surge recorded identically across 1h, 6h, and 24h windows simply reflects that the token launched within the last hour; this is not sustained multi-timeframe momentum.
Reason: An unidentified wallet holding 13.2% of supply, an unknown creator, sub-$20K daily volume, and a token age measured in minutes combine to make structural risk assessment effectively impossible, warranting a high-risk framing for anyone considering participation.
Report limitations
- This automated snapshot can be wrong, incomplete, or become outdated as on-chain and market conditions change.
- It is informational analysis, not financial advice or a guarantee that the token is safe.
Read the MemeAssist methodology for evidence sources, scoring and known constraints.
Analyzed: