ZARVIS Meme Coin Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

ZARVIS Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: Zarvis has an Overall Health Score of 44 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: Zarvis has a low Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.

ZARVIS Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

• ZARVIS is under 20 minutes old; all holder metrics, whale behaviour, and price levels are provisional snapshots with no durability evidence whatsoever. Any positive signal could reverse within minutes.
• No dev or creator wallet could be identified from on-chain data. This means insider selling cannot be detected or ruled out, and the slow-rug pattern cannot be monitored — a structural blind spot.
• In the first ~14 minutes, whale-sized wallets (>1% holdings) account for 28% of sell volume and big wallets (0.1–1%) account for 53%, meaning over 80% of selling originates from large players. Early profit-taking at this scale in a token this young is a caution flag.

ZARVIS Risk and Health Signals

• Both mintAuthorityActive and freezeAuthorityActive are false with null authorities; no dangerous extensions are active or dormant. The supply is fixed and holders cannot be frozen — a structural positive.
• Trading volume already exceeds $573K in the first sub-hour of the token's life, placing it well above the empirically meaningful volume threshold for fresh pairs and suggesting genuine market interest rather than a thin-trading token.
• Net volume is slightly positive (+$1.87M token units) with 876 buy trades vs 648 sell trades and 562 unique buyers vs 422 unique sellers — the market is not in net outflow despite heavy early whale selling.

ZARVIS Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 18.7% of supply.

Is ZARVIS Safe?

• Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
• Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
• Copycat check: no match detected.
• Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
• Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.

ZARVIS Trade Setup, Entry Levels and Targets

Support and resistance context: 1 support area and 2 resistance areas were identified from 1m market candles; nearest support: 0.00009527347910337275; nearest resistance: 0.0002284730283499373; Levels derived from 19 1m candles (~0 hours) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. Heuristic zones, not trading advice..

ZARVIS Price and Market Data

Assessment: ZARVIS ([redacted wallet]) is an extremely fresh PumpSwap token — under 20 minutes old at the time of this snapshot — making any structural judgement provisional by definition. The token has already attracted 943 holders with no mint or freeze authority active, which are clean structural signals, but the entire whale cohort has held for less than 15 minutes, offering no meaningful track record of conviction. Top-20 holders (excluding the pool) control ~30.6% of supply, spread fairly evenly in the 1–2.5% range per wallet, while the pool holds 13.3% — concentration is elevated but not extreme for a brand-new token. Sell pressure is broadly balanced (buy vol ~$391.7M vs sell vol ~$389.9M in token units over the 14-minute window), yet 80% of sell volume by weight comes from whale and big-wallet sellers, and ~24% of sell volume traces to wallets under 2 days old flipping quickly; the creator wallet is unidentifiable, which is a genuine unknown. Liquidity at ~$38.9K against a $161K market cap (24% ratio) is thin but above the critical floor, and the 24-hour volume already exceeds $573K — a meaningfully strong early flow signal. The token is too young to assign durable scores; all sub-scores and the verdict carry low confidence.

Reason: ZARVIS is under 20 minutes old with an unidentifiable creator, the majority of sell pressure coming from large wallets, and all key levels based on just 19 candles — the structure is tradeable for high-risk appetites but lacks the track record for a clean directional call.

Report limitations

• This automated snapshot can be wrong, incomplete, or become outdated as on-chain and market conditions change.
• It is informational analysis, not financial advice or a guarantee that the token is safe.