Server-rendered summary

TIGRINO Meme Coin Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

TIGRINO Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: Leopardus Tilcayo has an Overall Health Score of 55 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: Leopardus Tilcayo has a low Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.

TIGRINO Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

  • At just ~1.1 days old, TIGRINO has no demonstrated ability to retain holders through a cooling period. Every structural metric — accumulation, concentration, price stability — is a 24-hour snapshot with no durable evidence behind it.
  • 15 wallets each hold over 1% of supply (~21.3% combined), none labelled. No clustering is flagged and no dev wallet is identified, but the lack of identity on these large holders means their intent and coordination cannot be confirmed from public data.
  • ~$187K in pool liquidity against a $2.71M market cap means meaningful exit size by any top-holder would cause significant price impact; a coordinated sell by even 2-3 large wallets could gap price through support.

TIGRINO Risk and Health Signals

  • Among the top 10 tracked non-pool whales, 7 are classified as accumulating and 0 are distributing; net whale inflow over 24h is approximately 60M tokens. While holding duration is very short, the directional behaviour is clearly buy-sided at this snapshot.
  • 24h volume of $15.3M against a $2.71M market cap represents a ~5.6x turnover ratio, indicating exceptional speculative interest and active price discovery. Buy transactions (61,237) meaningfully exceed sells (52,731) over 24h.
  • Both mint and freeze authorities are confirmed null/inactive, removing the two most dangerous token-control vectors. No active dangerous extensions are present.

TIGRINO Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 16.1% of supply.

Is TIGRINO Safe?

  • Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
  • Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
  • Copycat check: no match detected.
  • Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
  • Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.

TIGRINO Trade Setup, Entry Levels and Targets

Support and resistance context: 2 support areas and 4 resistance areas were identified from 15m market candles; nearest support: 0.001987188685438519; nearest resistance: 0.003300408963629413; Levels derived from 106 15m candles (~26 hours) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. Heuristic zones, not trading advice..

TIGRINO Price and Market Data

Assessment: TIGRINO (Leopardus Tilcayo) is an ultra-fresh PumpSwap memecoin just ~1.1 days old, trading at a $2.71M market cap with $186K DEX liquidity (~6.9% liq/mcap ratio — thin but not critical at this stage). The token launched with a 297% 24h price surge and is sustaining enormous volume ($15.3M in 24h) relative to its size, indicating intense speculative interest. Mint and freeze authorities are both inactive, removing two key structural rug vectors. Holder concentration is notable — 15 wallets hold more than 1% each (~21.3% of supply), and the top 20 non-pool holders control ~25% — but no dev wallet has been identified, no insider clusters are flagged, and the whale cohort shows 7 of 10 tracked whales actively accumulating with zero distributing; however, average whale holding duration is just 0.67 days, meaning this stickiness is entirely unproven. Sell pressure in the observed window is dominated by small, retail-sized exits rather than any identified insider or top-holder; the largest single seller (~52.9% of recent sell volume) is a small wallet that fully exited. The token is too young to judge long-term durability — any structural read here is a 24-hour snapshot, not a track record, and confidence is accordingly capped.

Reason: TIGRINO shows strong momentum and clean whale accumulation, but extreme youth (~1.1 days), thin liquidity, unidentified large holders, and a worsening decentralisation trend make this a high-risk speculative play with no durable structural evidence to support conviction.

Analyzed: