jelly Meme Coin Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

jelly Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: Jelly net has an Overall Health Score of 32 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: Jelly net has a low Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.

Trade Check: Jelly net Trade Check decision: wait. Token safety: caution. Trade Setup quality: weak. Condition to watch: Require verified historical price coverage and reassess the market structure.

Trade Setup: Trade Setup status: weak. Trade levels are time-sensitive and should be re-analysed when stale.

jelly Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

• On-chain evidence shows direct token transfers between wallets [redacted wallet] and [redacted wallet], which together hold ~7.4% of supply. [redacted wallet] is the only distributing whale in the cohort, having already sold after just ~1 hour of holding — consistent with a coordinated exit pattern.
• The token is approximately 6 hours old with only 68 five-minute candles of price history. Historical price damage is unknown (not assessed), meaning there is no basis to evaluate durability, and every structural risk carries proportionally more weight given the absence of any track record.
• 16 wallets each hold over 1% of supply (~33% combined), and the average whale holding duration is only ~0.15 days. The majority of whales entered in the last few hours and have not been tested by a sustained drawdown, making their commitment entirely unknown.

jelly Risk and Health Signals

• Both mintAuthority and freezeAuthority are null and inactive, removing the risk of supply inflation or wallet-level freezing by a central actor. This is a basic but genuine structural positive.
• 9 of 10 tracked whales are classified as accumulating with positive net 1d/7d/30d flows; net whale inflow over the observed period is strongly positive in token terms, suggesting active buying interest from large holders — though holding durations are too short to treat this as conviction.
• 24h volume of ~$2.07M against a ~$42K market cap represents a volume-to-market-cap ratio of roughly 49x, indicating intense speculative interest and high turnover; this also means the pool is being traded actively enough to provide exit liquidity in short bursts.

jelly Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 26.0% of supply.

Is jelly Safe?

• Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
• Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
• Copycat check: no match detected.
• Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
• Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.

jelly Trade Setup, Entry Levels and Targets

Support and resistance context: 1 support area and 2 resistance areas were identified from 5m market candles; nearest support: 0.00003698129987008282; nearest resistance: 0.0000447286409232233; Levels derived from 68 5m candles (~6 hours) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. Heuristic zones, not trading advice..

jelly Price and Market Data

Assessment: Jelly net (jelly) is an extremely young token — only ~6 hours old at assessment — launched on PumpSwap with a micro-cap of ~$42K and no track record whatsoever; historical price damage could not be assessed due to insufficient chart history, so the historical risk dimension is unknown rather than clean. Mint and freeze authorities are revoked, which is structurally positive, but a confirmed on-chain cluster links wallets [redacted wallet] and [redacted wallet] (combined ~7.4% of supply via direct token transfers), and the lone distributing whale ([redacted wallet]) has already begun selling after holding for just over an hour, raising coordinated-exit concerns. Concentration is elevated — 16 wallets hold over 1% of supply each, totalling ~33% of supply, and the top 20 non-pool holders control ~36% — with average holding duration across whales of only ~0.15 days, making it impossible to distinguish committed buyers from scalpers planning to exit. Liquidity of ~$18.8K against a ~$42K market cap is thin but covers roughly 45% of market cap, and 24h volume of ~$2.07M is exceptionally high relative to size, though much of that volume appears to be rapid churn with net sell pressure across both the 1h and broader ~1.5h window; this is too young to judge durability, and the structural risks dominate any short-term bullish read.

Reason: A confirmed on-chain wallet cluster with an already-distributing member, near-zero holding durations across all large holders, unknown creator identity, and only ~6 hours of price history make structural risk the dominant observable factor — the high volume is real but is occurring in a context wher

Report limitations

• Historical price-risk coverage is unavailable.
• This automated snapshot can be wrong, incomplete, or become outdated as on-chain and market conditions change.
• It is informational analysis, not financial advice or a guarantee that the token is safe.