ZEBRA Meme Coin Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

ZEBRA Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: Zebra has an Overall Health Score of 42 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: Zebra has a low Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.

ZEBRA Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

• 24-hour trading volume is only ~$1,318 against a ~$10.6K market cap, making this token effectively untradeable at any meaningful size without severe slippage. Historical pattern evidence shows sub-$40K vol24 tokens carry a heavily negative win rate.
• At ~$9.95K DEX liquidity vs ~$10.6K market cap, any position of even modest size risks collapsing price on exit; this is a structural sellability concern, not merely a ratio concern.
• Over the full ~5.2-day window, sell volume (~$796K token-units) exceeds buy volume (~$738K), with whale and big-wallet categories accounting for 96.7% of sell volume — though no confirmed insider selling is present, the sell-side skew is structurally unfavourable.

ZEBRA Risk and Health Signals

• Both mint and freeze authorities are null and inactive — no token minting or wallet freezing is possible, removing two of the most common rug vectors for Solana meme tokens.
• All 10 tracked top-non-pool whales are either holding or accumulating over the 30-day window, with zero recorded as distributing; net 7-day whale flow is strongly positive in token-unit terms.
• Three whales added material positions recently: [redacted wallet] (+2.55% of supply within 24h), 3iy…ncX (+3.22% over 7 days), and EaM…GbK (+1.86% over 7 days, confirmed never-sold); this is a mild buy-side signal, tempered by thin liquidity context.

ZEBRA Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 23.6% of supply.

Is ZEBRA Safe?

• Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
• Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
• Copycat check: no match detected.
• Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
• Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.

ZEBRA Trade Setup, Entry Levels and Targets

Support and resistance context: 1 support area and 2 resistance areas were identified from 1h market candles; nearest support: 0.00001006012319844198; nearest resistance: 0.000020125826807771416; Levels derived from 335 1h candles (~14.0 days) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. History is too short for repeated-touch levels; some levels are derived from volume-profile nodes and the window high/low (lower confidence, untested). Heuristic zones, not trading advice..

ZEBRA Price and Market Data

Assessment: ZEBRA ([redacted wallet]) is a 14-day-old PumpSwap micro-cap with a market cap of just ~$10.6K and liquidity of ~$9.95K — nearly 1:1 liquidity-to-market-cap, which means the pool is almost entirely composed of backing rather than traded value, and exit feasibility for any meaningful position is severely constrained. The token's mint and freeze authorities are both revoked, which is a structural positive. Whale cohort behaviour is mixed: 3 of 10 tracked whales are accumulating, 7 are holding, and none are distributing — but the net sell pressure over the observed window is negative, driven by large unknown-age wallets accounting for 97%+ of sell volume. The top-10 non-pool concentration sits at ~23.6%, spread across 12 unlabelled whale wallets with no clustering identified, which is moderate for a token this young. The token is too young (14 days) and too thinly traded ($1.3K in 24h volume) to establish any durable track record; all structural readings should be treated as provisional, and the micro-cap/low-volume combination substantially limits actionability.

Reason: Critically low 24-hour volume and near-parity liquidity-to-market-cap make this token effectively untradeable at any meaningful size, and the combination of unknown creator identity, sell-dominant recent flow, and a 14-day track record provides insufficient basis for conviction despite the positive

Report limitations

• This automated snapshot can be wrong, incomplete, or become outdated as on-chain and market conditions change.
• It is informational analysis, not financial advice or a guarantee that the token is safe.