ECSTASY Meme Coin Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

ECSTASY Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: ECSTASY has an Overall Health Score of 44 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: ECSTASY has a low Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.

Trade Check: ECSTASY Trade Check decision: wait. Token safety: caution. Trade Setup quality: weak. Condition to watch: Require verified historical price coverage and reassess the market structure.

Trade Setup: Trade Setup status: weak. Trade levels are time-sensitive and should be re-analysed when stale.

ECSTASY Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

• The token is less than one day old (~0.94 days), providing no basis to assess holder durability, developer commitment, or price stability. All structural signals are provisional and can reverse rapidly.
• One whale entered with a position implying over 217M tokens (~22%+ of supply) and sold nearly all of it within the observed window, retaining only ~1.81% today. This level of inside selling from a near-launch entrant is a major red flag even if no formal insider link is confirmed.
• DEX liquidity of ~$27.9K against a $98.6K market cap (~28% ratio) means any meaningful exit by a top holder could move price severely. The low-liquidity environment amplifies both upside spikes and downside collapses.

ECSTASY Risk and Health Signals

• The pump.fun creator (identified with high confidence) holds ~1.79% of supply, has never sold, and shows an accumulating status across all observed time windows. This is a meaningful structural positive relative to peers.
• Nine of the ten tracked whale wallets are classified as accumulating, and three are flagged as having never sold. The cohort is net-positive on a count basis, though the one distributing whale's volume dominates the net flow figure.
• Over the past 24 hours, buys outpaced sells nearly 2:1 by transaction count (13,666 buys vs 6,689 sells), and the 6-hour ratio is even more skewed at roughly 3:1 — indicating sustained retail demand interest.

ECSTASY Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 16.8% of supply.

Is ECSTASY Safe?

• Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
• Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
• Copycat check: no match detected.
• Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
• Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.

ECSTASY Trade Setup, Entry Levels and Targets

Support and resistance context: 4 support areas and 4 resistance areas were identified from 15m market candles; nearest support: 0.00008941190891804252; nearest resistance: 0.00010748135708867091; Levels derived from 90 15m candles (~22 hours) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. Heuristic zones, not trading advice..

ECSTASY Price and Market Data

Assessment: The token is far too young (less than one day) to assess long-term durability; all structural signals must be treated as provisional. The creator wallet (identified with high confidence) holds ~1.79% of supply, has never sold, and is currently classified as accumulating — a genuine positive, but meaningful only if it holds. One whale ([redacted wallet]) is distributing aggressively and has shed a net ~217M tokens over the observed window, far exceeding its current ~1.81% holding, which implies it entered and sold the bulk of a much larger position — this is the most significant seller pressure signal in the data. Mint and freeze authorities are both revoked, removing two common structural attack vectors, and the 2:1 buy-to-sell transaction ratio shows near-term demand, but thin liquidity, a single dominant distributor, and extreme youth keep confidence low.

Reason: Extreme token youth combined with one whale having liquidated a position implying over 20% of supply within launch-day windows, thin liquidity of ~$28K, and unavailable historical price risk data mean structural danger cannot be ruled out despite positive creator and buy-flow signals.

Report limitations

• Historical price-risk coverage is unavailable.
• This automated snapshot can be wrong, incomplete, or become outdated as on-chain and market conditions change.
• It is informational analysis, not financial advice or a guarantee that the token is safe.