Server-rendered summary

Ansemmas Meme Coin Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

Exact Solana mint: HXxJdaQbrYRvwTAM8M8mUPyoRPvmyuUbPFBRkiAAMASS

Ansemmas Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: Ansemmas has an Overall Health Score of 38 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: Ansemmas has a low Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.

Ansemmas Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

  • The token has been live for under one hour, providing no track record whatsoever. All structural readings — holder quality, whale conviction, sell pressure — are provisional snapshots with no demonstrated durability, and the probability of rapid collapse is elevated.
  • No creator wallet could be identified from public data. Insider exposure — including potential bundled buys at launch, creator supply, or coordinated cluster activity — cannot be assessed, representing the most critical blind spot in this analysis.
  • In the ~96-second sell-pressure window captured, sell volume (~13.9M tokens) outpaced buy volume (~9.9M tokens) by ~$4M net. Approximately 55% of sell volume originated from wallets under 2 days old, consistent with early flippers exiting at the post-launch peak.

Ansemmas Risk and Health Signals

  • $666K in 24h volume against a $203K market cap indicates strong speculative interest. Buy count (9,025) exceeds sell count (6,869) over the same period, showing more individual buy transactions than sells.
  • Both mint and freeze authorities are confirmed inactive with no extensions flagged, removing the risk of supply inflation or wallet-level asset freezing by a controller.
  • No whale wallet has sold any tokens within the observable history window. However, average whale holding duration is under 1 hour — this reflects no selling yet, not proven conviction.

Ansemmas Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 19.8% of supply.

Is Ansemmas Safe?

  • Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
  • Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
  • Copycat check: no match detected.
  • Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
  • Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.

Ansemmas Trade Setup, Entry Levels and Targets

Support and resistance context: 4 support areas and 4 resistance areas were identified from 1m market candles; nearest support: 0.00017458567139315114; nearest resistance: 0.00022386000000000001; Levels derived from 51 1m candles (~1 hours) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. Heuristic zones, not trading advice. Chart history could not yet support tested swing levels. The token is only about 0.0 days old. These lower-confidence planning levels are projected mechanically from the observed market price and must be rechecked as price history develops..

Ansemmas Price and Market Data

Assessment: Ansemmas (Ansemmas) is an extremely young token — barely ~51 minutes old at the time of this snapshot — launched on PumpSwap on Solana with a market cap of ~$203K and $41.8K in DEX liquidity. The price has surged +349% since launch, and 24h volume of $666K dwarfs the market cap, indicating intense speculative activity concentrated into a very short window. Holder concentration is moderate for a brand-new token: the top 10 non-pool wallets hold ~19.8% of supply, with the single largest non-pool wallet at ~3.6%; all 10 tracked whale wallets are classified as accumulating, though their average holding period is under an hour, so "accumulating" here means they have not yet sold — not that they have proven long-term conviction. Critically, no dev wallet could be identified from public data, making insider/creator risk unquantifiable; this is a structural blind spot, not reassurance. Sell pressure in the observed window shows net sell-volume exceeding buy-volume in token terms (~55% of sell volume comes from wallets under 2 days old), and several small wallets have already fully exited, though no top-holder or dev dumping is confirmed. Both mint and freeze authorities are inactive, removing two key structural risks. The token is far too young to assess long-term durability, and any positive structural reading must be treated as provisional.

Reason: An unidentifiable creator, sub-hour token age, net sell volume in the latest window, and a price extended far above any tested support make structural confidence extremely low — this is a high-volatility speculative play with no demonstrated durability.

Report limitations

  • This automated snapshot can be wrong, incomplete, or become outdated as on-chain and market conditions change.
  • It is informational analysis, not financial advice or a guarantee that the token is safe.

Read the MemeAssist methodology for evidence sources, scoring and known constraints.

Analyzed: