clausius Meme Coin Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

clausius Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: clausius has an Overall Health Score of 42 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: clausius has a low Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.

clausius Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

• The token is under 15 minutes old at snapshot time. Every metric — holder behaviour, volume, price action — is a first-impression, not evidence of durability. All sub-scores carry very low conviction.
• No creator wallet could be identified from on-chain data. Insider exposure cannot be assessed or ruled out; this is a structural unknown that must be treated as a risk, not a neutral.
• Two whale-tier sellers contributed over 21% of total sell volume in the tracked sub-hour window. [redacted wallet] sold ~17.4M tokens (~15.9% of sell volume) while remaining a top holder; early whale flipping in a thin-liquidity token can compress price rapidly.

clausius Risk and Health Signals

• Both mint and freeze authority are null and inactive, meaning no new supply can be minted and holders cannot be blocked from transferring. This is the minimum structural safety baseline for a new token.
• 229 buys versus 175 sells were recorded in the tracked window, with 160 unique buyers against 115 unique sellers — a modestly buy-side-dominant opening that suggests genuine early demand, not a one-sided dump.
• The data's slow-rug heuristic returns 'low' with zero signals. No coordinated wallet clusters were identified, and the dev-sell risk cannot be assessed but is not currently flagged.

clausius Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 16.7% of supply.

Is clausius Safe?

• Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
• Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
• Copycat check: no match detected.
• Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
• Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.

clausius Trade Setup, Entry Levels and Targets

Support and resistance context: 2 support areas and 4 resistance areas were identified from provisional market candles; nearest support: 0.000126528; nearest resistance: 0.00013839; Chart history could not yet support tested swing levels. The token is only about 0.0 days old. These lower-confidence planning levels are projected mechanically from the observed market price and must be rechecked as price history develops..

clausius Price and Market Data

Assessment: Clausius (clausius) is an extremely new PumpSwap token, launched fewer than 15 minutes ago at the time of this snapshot, with a market cap of ~$132K and 855 holders. Both mint and freeze authorities are revoked, which is a positive structural baseline, but the token is far too young to judge any durability — every metric here is a snapshot of the first few minutes of trading, not a track record. The top 17 non-pool wallets ("whales") each hold 1–2% of supply and all show "accumulating" status with holding durations measured in fractions of a day; while no insider clustering was detected and no dev wallet was identified, these holders entered within minutes of launch — their coordination cannot be ruled out from the data provided. Liquidity sits at ~$31K against a $132K market cap (~23% ratio), which is thin but not catastrophic for a sub-$200K token; however, 24h volume of ~$160K falls just below the empirical threshold where fresh-pair momentum tends to be durable. The buy/sell ratio is modestly positive (229 buys vs 175 sells in the tracked window) but sell pressure by volume is nearly balanced (~$109K sells vs ~$108.8K buys), and two whale-size sellers contributed over 21% of sell volume in a sub-hour window — a caution signal on this timescale. At under 0.01 days old, no dimension can be scored with confidence, and all levels are mechanically projected with zero chart-tested touches.

Reason: The token is under 15 minutes old with no chart history, unknown dev identity, unverifiable whale coordination, and thin liquidity — structural confidence is near-zero and all signals are provisional first-minutes snapshots rather than evidence of durability.

Report limitations

• This automated snapshot can be wrong, incomplete, or become outdated as on-chain and market conditions change.
• It is informational analysis, not financial advice or a guarantee that the token is safe.