UMIA Meme Coin Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

UMIA Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: Umia has an Overall Health Score of 18 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: Umia has a low Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.

UMIA Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

• 51 wallets hold ~86.3% of supply with an average holding period of ~8 minutes and 0% never-sold rate. This is structurally indistinguishable from a coordinated early-entry/distribution setup.
• Whale-size wallets (>1% of supply) account for ~42.5% of all sell volume across both the 1H and 12H windows; wallets like 5xA5…am4 and 3XHK…wzH appear as top sellers in every time window, suggesting organised distribution rather than random profit-taking.
• $47.7K DEX liquidity against a ~$1.47M market cap (3.2% ratio) means any whale attempting to exit even 1–2% of supply will face catastrophic slippage; this creates a first-mover dynamic that punishes latecomers severely.

UMIA Risk and Health Signals

• Both mint and freeze authority are null and inactive, and no dangerous token extensions are present — the token cannot be inflated or accounts frozen by a controller, which removes two common rug vectors.
• Over 40,000 buy transactions and $51M in 24H volume with 2,212 unique buyers in the tracked window indicates genuine market attention, though volume quality is undermined by concurrent whale distribution.
• The dramatic price appreciation reflects early speculative momentum but also means latecomers are entering at the highest prices while whales who entered near launch are actively reducing positions.

UMIA Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 19.5% of supply.

Is UMIA Safe?

• Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
• Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
• Copycat check: no match detected.
• Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
• Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.

UMIA Trade Setup, Entry Levels and Targets

Support and resistance context: 1 support area and 3 resistance areas were identified from 1h market candles; nearest support: 0.000008363658150209897; nearest resistance: 0.000015062409618680654; Levels derived from 32 1h candles (~31 hours) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. Price is at/near its window high with no overhead swing resistance; resistance shown is the window high plus measured-move projections. History is too short for repeated-touch levels; some levels are derived from volume-profile nodes and the window high/low (lower confidence, untested). Heuristic zones, not trading advice..

UMIA Price and Market Data

Assessment: UMIA ([redacted wallet]) is a PumpSwap-native token just 1.3 days old, having launched on 2026-08-26, with a market cap of ~$1.47M and only $47.7K in DEX liquidity — a dangerously thin liquidity-to-market-cap ratio of ~3.2% that makes large exits near-impossible without severe slippage. The health score trajectory (18 → 14 → current) reflects a consistently deteriorating structure with no stabilisation, and this token is far too young to assess long-term durability. Holder concentration is extreme: 51 whale wallets hold ~86.3% of supply, all established within the last ~30 hours, with an average whale holding duration of only 8 minutes; zero whales are confirmed as never-sold. Active whale sell pressure accounts for ~42.5% of all sell volume over the tracked window, with multiple top-holders (e.g. 5xA5…am4, 3XHK…wzH, 59EH…bZ7) appearing as repeat top sellers across 1H, 12H, and the full tracking window — a pattern consistent with coordinated distribution into the price pump rather than organic churn. Mint and freeze authorities are inactive and no dangerous token extensions are present, which are the only structural positives in an otherwise high-risk picture.

Reason: Coordinated multi-whale distribution from near-zero-duration holders into critically thin liquidity, with a worsening concentration trend and no structural improvement across the token's 1.3-day history, makes participation indefensible at current price levels.

Report limitations

• This automated snapshot can be wrong, incomplete, or become outdated as on-chain and market conditions change.
• It is informational analysis, not financial advice or a guarantee that the token is safe.