Automated risk analysis by MemeAssist.
Saved analysis: . The findings below describe evidence recorded at that time, not live market conditions.
At a glance: ███WIF is a 2-day-old PumpSwap token that has suffered a confirmed 60.4% drawdown from its sustained peak within the last 24 hours, classifying historical price risk as severe — a short-term positive h24 (+11.6%) does not erase this damage. Top-10 non-pool concentration is modest at ~4.9%, with 10 dolphin-sized whales all showing zero net change in the past day and no identified insider or creator wallet. Both mint and freeze authorities are revoked, but liquidity ($84K) is thin relative to the $854K market cap (~9.9%), and the token is far too young to assess long-term durability.
Exact Solana mint: 8U6Rw9WVtPb9ShnUo1HeSKBLrGxWLSczCd2RSdYFpump. Verify this Solana mint on Solscan.
███WIF Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary
Overall Health Score: At the saved analysis on 2026-10-29T00:12:21.166Z, ███WIF received an Overall Health Score of 33 out of 100.
Rug Risk Rating: At that analysis, ███WIF received a low Rug Risk Rating. This reflects recorded on-chain evidence and is not a current safety guarantee.
Trade Check: ███WIF Trade Check decision recorded at analysis time: avoid. Recorded token safety: dangerous. Recorded Trade Setup quality: weak. Condition recorded then: Do not enter while a verified 60% collapse remains in the last 24-hour evidence window. A new completed assessment is required before considering another setup. This is a saved assessment, not a live buy or sell signal.
Trade Setup: Recorded Trade Setup status: weak. These were levels at the analysis time, not live entry instructions. Re-analyse before relying on them.
What changed between saved analyses?
No earlier completed analysis is available for comparison.
███WIF Rug-Pull Risk Analysis
- Price fell 60.4% from a sustained peak to later confirmed closes within the observed 50-candle window (~2 days). A h24 surface recovery of +11.6% does not erase this structural damage; the current price is ~66% below the session peak of $0.00257.
- 19 wallets purchased at the exact pair-creation timestamp (2026-10-26T22:59:22). This is timing evidence of suspected coordinated or scripted entry, but shared ownership or bundling is not confirmed; identity of these wallets relative to top holders is unknown. Same-slot timing alone does not establish coordination or common ownership; shared signed transactions establish co-execution only.
- No creator wallet was identified; creator confidence is null. Insider exposure, locked supply, and prior rug history cannot be assessed. This is an unknown, not a clean bill of health.
███WIF Risk and Health Signals
- Both mint and freeze authorities are null and inactive. No additional supply can be minted and no wallet freeze is possible — a meaningful structural baseline for a 2-day-old token.
- All 10 tracked dolphin-tier whales show zero net outflow over the past 24 hours and positive accumulation since launch; none of the top holders have sold into the h6 -49.5% decline.
- Current creator holdings were not established in this saved evidence. A last-sale timestamp was not provided; this does not establish ongoing selling or team-wide exposure. The 1-hour window shows net sell volume of ~$7.7M vs.
███WIF Holder Distribution
Holder concentration: At the saved analysis, the top 10 non-pool holders held 4.94% of supply.
Is ███WIF Safe?
- Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
- Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
- Copycat check: no match detected.
- Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
- Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.
███WIF Trade Setup, Entry Levels and Targets
Support and resistance context: 2 support areas and 3 resistance areas were identified from 1h market candles; nearest support: 0.0007222610549812293; nearest resistance: 0.0011203178945021638; Levels derived from 50 1h candles (~2.0 days) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. History is too short for repeated-touch levels; some levels are derived from volume-profile nodes and the window high/low (lower confidence, untested). Heuristic zones, not trading advice..
███WIF Analysis Rationale
Reason: A confirmed 60%+ same-pool price collapse within the last 24 hours mandates avoid regardless of positive structural signals. Severe price collapse: 60.43% from a sustained peak to later confirmed closes within the last 24 hours. Do not enter; a bounce does not erase this market damage. This is not proof of a rug.
Report limitations
- Price collapse is market damage, not proof of deliberate fraud.
- This automated snapshot can be wrong, incomplete, or become outdated as on-chain and market conditions change.
- It is informational analysis, not financial advice or a guarantee that the token is safe.
███WIF Risk Analysis Questions
Which Solana token does this ███WIF report analyse?
███WIF (███WIF) is identified by Solana mint 8U6Rw9WVtPb9ShnUo1HeSKBLrGxWLSczCd2RSdYFpump. Names and symbols can be reused by unrelated tokens; verify the mint address before trading. These are saved analysis observations dated 2026-10-29T00:12:21.166Z, not live market conditions. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.
What is the AI health score for ███WIF (███WIF)?
The saved analysis recorded an AI health score of 33/100 for ███WIF, based on on-chain behaviour, holder distribution and liquidity at that time. These are saved analysis observations dated 2026-10-29T00:12:21.166Z, not live market conditions. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.
What is the automated rug risk level for ███WIF (███WIF)?
The saved on-chain checks rated rug risk for ███WIF as 'low'. This was an observation at analysis time, not a current safety guarantee or financial advice. These are saved analysis observations dated 2026-10-29T00:12:21.166Z, not live market conditions. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.
What is the entry assessment for ███WIF (███WIF)?
The entry assessment recorded for ███WIF was avoid. It is not a live signal or an instruction to buy at the current price. These are saved analysis observations dated 2026-10-29T00:12:21.166Z, not live market conditions. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.
How much liquidity does ███WIF (███WIF) have?
The liquidity recorded in the saved analysis for ███WIF was $84,261. These are saved analysis observations dated 2026-10-29T00:12:21.166Z, not live market conditions. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.
Are the mint and freeze authorities active for ███WIF (███WIF)?
At the saved check for ███WIF, the mint authority was revoked and the freeze authority was revoked. These are saved analysis observations dated 2026-10-29T00:12:21.166Z, not live market conditions. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.
What is the top-10 holder concentration for ███WIF (███WIF)?
At the saved check, the top 10 holders held 4.94% of the total supply of ███WIF. These are saved analysis observations dated 2026-10-29T00:12:21.166Z, not live market conditions. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.
Was a sell route found for ███WIF (███WIF) in the saved analysis?
A sell route was observed for ███WIF at analysis time. A quoted route is not an executed sale and does not establish that the token is sellable now. These are saved analysis observations dated 2026-10-29T00:12:21.166Z, not live market conditions. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.
When was the AI analysis for ███WIF (███WIF) last updated?
The on-chain analysis for ███WIF was last updated on 29/10/2026, 00:12:21 GMT. These are saved analysis observations dated 2026-10-29T00:12:21.166Z, not live market conditions. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.
Analyzed: