Server-rendered summary
PATE Meme Coin Risk Analysis & Trade Setup
Saved analysis: . The findings below describe evidence recorded at that time, not live market conditions.
Historical analysis snapshot. This report is more than six hours old. This snapshot is not a current buy or sell signal. Trade decisions, prices, levels and sellability may have changed. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.
Exact Solana mint: 24EX9CQqEpR9mNUDTjkooKqRTf2pkY2mgbDqwNDwpump
PATE Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary
Overall Health Score: Pepe Cate Coin has an Overall Health Score of 58 out of 100.
Rug Risk Rating: Pepe Cate Coin has a low Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.
PATE Rug-Pull Risk Analysis
- At just 4 days old, PATE has no history to validate whether current accumulation or holder stickiness is genuine. Any structural read should carry substantially reduced confidence.
- The largest non-pool wallet (3DCsa…Cvi) holds 11.3% of supply; the top 10 ex-pool wallets collectively hold 35.1%, and the decentralisation trend is worsening. A coordinated exit by even 2–3 of these wallets would severely impact price and liquidity.
- With only $37k in DEX liquidity against a $160k market cap, large holders attempting to exit would face significant slippage; the top non-pool holder alone represents a notional value (~$18k) approaching 50% of the entire pool.
PATE Risk and Health Signals
- The deployer wallet (9aztC…Kjv) holds 0% of supply with zero recorded sales, suggesting it distributed tokens at launch without retaining a dump position — a structurally cleaner setup than most tokens of this age.
- Both mintAuthorityActive and freezeAuthorityActive are false with null authority addresses, eliminating the two most dangerous unilateral supply/liquidity controls.
- All tracked large holders are either holding or adding to positions; net whale token flow over 1 day is +12.6M tokens and over 7 days +103M tokens, indicating no coordinated dump in progress.
PATE Holder Distribution
Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 35.1% of supply.
Is PATE Safe?
- Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
- Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
- Copycat check: no match detected.
- Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
- Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.
PATE Trade Setup, Entry Levels and Targets
Support and resistance context: 2 support areas and 4 resistance areas were identified from 1h market candles; nearest support: 0.0001710710444003134; nearest resistance: 0.00020844605635931282; Levels derived from 99 1h candles (~4.1 days) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. Heuristic zones, not trading advice..
PATE Price and Market Data
Assessment: PATE is a 4-day-old PumpSwap memecoin with a $160k market cap and $37k in DEX liquidity, giving a liquidity-to-market-cap ratio of ~23% which is adequate for its size but still thin for large exits. Mint and freeze authorities are inactive, removing the most acute structural control risks. Holder concentration is elevated — the top non-pool holder (3DCsa…Cvi) controls 11.3% and the top 10 ex-pool wallets hold 35.1% — but no clusters have been identified, no insider wallet is flagged as selling, and 7 of 10 tracked whales are actively accumulating with zero distribution signals. The dev wallet (9aztC…Kjv) holds 0% and shows no sales history, which is a clean structural read, though the token is too young (4 days) to judge whether this durability will hold. Overall flow is net-positive across all timeframes, though sell pressure is dominated by 'big' wallets (64% of 5h sell volume from 0.1–1% holders) and the decentralisation trend is flagged as worsening, requiring monitoring.
Report limitations
- This automated snapshot can be wrong, incomplete, or become outdated as on-chain and market conditions change.
- It is informational analysis, not financial advice or a guarantee that the token is safe.
Read the MemeAssist methodology for evidence sources, scoring and known constraints.
Analyzed: